State v. Durant
Syllabus
Appellant Larry Durant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) for sexually abusing a teenage girl in his church office where he served as the pastor. At trial, the State called three other girls who claimed that Durant had abused them in a similar fashion. The trial court permitted the testimony as evidence of a common scheme or plan under Rule 404(b), SCRE, finding the evidence admissible pursuant to State v. Wallace, 384 S.C. 428, 683 S.E.2d 275 (2009). Applying the framework announced in State v. Perry, we affirm the admissibility of the girls' testimony. We also affirm Durant's conviction because while the State failed to accurately disclose the criminal history of al witness, that information was not material and therefore no Brady violation occurred.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsThird Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 275×
- United States v. Charles Jay AutenFifth Circuit· 1980-12-08· cited 116×
- State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 89×
- State v. Von DohlenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-17· cited 58×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-27· cited 57×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 56×
- State v. McClellanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-11-26· cited 54×
- United States v. Allen YoungSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-01· cited 51×
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 34×
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-09· cited 33×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-12· cited 31×
- Tucker v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 29×
- State v. CrimSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-11· cited 13×
- Johnson ex rel. Estate of Valenzuela v. Sam English Grading, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-05-06· cited 10×
- State v. NikolaenkoIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-10-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.