Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the issue in a case involving a guilty plea is whether there is a reasonable probability that but for the failure to disclose the Brady material, the defendant would have refused to plead and would have gone to trial”
• reasoning that “prosecutors may be tempted to deliberately withhold exculpatory information as part of an attempt to elicit guilty pleas”
• explaining “there 14 is no constitutional right to counsel at a collateral, post-conviction section 2255 proceeding”
• explaining “there is no constitutional right to counsel at a collateral, post-conviction section 2255 proceeding”
• “the decision whether or not to plead guilty is often heavily influenced by [the defendant’s] appraisal of the prosecution’s case”
• \the decision whether or not to plead guilty is often heavily influenced by [the defendant's] appraisal of the prosecution's case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).