Skip to main content
· 3/29/1994

George A. Darnell v. Target Stores

Citations

  • 16 F.3d 174
  • 1994 WL 32297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an affidavit which is contradicted by the affiant's deposition testimony is “without factual support in the record ... and cannot defeat a motion for summary judgment”
  • stating that \parties cannot thwart the purpose of Rule 56 by creating issues of fact through affidavits that contradict their own depositions\ and \self-serving affidavits without factual support in the record will not defeat a motion for summary judgment\
  • stating that \parties cannot thwart the purpose of Rule 56 by creating issues of fact through affidavits that contradict their own depositions\ and \self-serving affidavits without factual support in the record will not defeat a motion for summary judgment\
  • “Inherently depositions carry an increased level of reliability. Depositions are adversarial in nature and provide the opportunity for direct and cross-examination.”
  • “Inherently depositions carry an increased level of reliability. Depositions are adversarial in nature and provide the opportunity for direct and cross-examination.”
  • “Inherently depositions carry an increased level of reliability. Depositions are adversarial in nature and provide the opportunity for direct and cross-examination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.