Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]n inconsistent affidavit may preclude summary judgment ... if the affiant was confused at the deposition and the affidavit explains those aspects of the deposition testimony”
• holding that “[a]n inconsistent affidavit may preclude summary judgment ... if the affiant was confused at the deposition and the affidavit explains those aspects of the deposition testimony”
• under Indiana law, statute of limitations for products liability claim began to run when doctors told plaintiff her IUD “was one of several possible causes of her illness”
• “When a plaintiff learns of information that would lead to the discovery of the cause of action through diligence, the statute of limitations begins to run, regardless of concealment.”
• same with regard to the IUD made by A.H. Robins Company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).