Paul H. KRALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS’ AFFAIRS, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conviction for sale 24 of a controlled substance under § 220.39(1) is an aggravated 3 1 felony
• observing that a reasonable inference of age discrimination may be drawn from the selection of an individual belonging to ADEA’s protected class of individuals over 40 years of age if that person is “sufficiently younger” than the complainant
• observing that a reasonable inference of age discrimination may be drawn from the selection of an individual belonging to ADEA’s protected class of individuaAn ls over 40 years of age if that person is “sufficiently younger” than the complainant
• noting a bad business judgment on behalf of a decisionmaker is not enough to establish pretext
• noting a bad business judgment on behalf of a decisionmaker is not enough to establish pretext
• treating an applicant’s right to bring a claim under § 4(a)(1) as unquestioned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).