Anthony Piscione v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a human resources consultant exercised discretion in his duties by, among other things, “improving] client services” and being “responsible for several clients”
• stating that an affidavit that contradicts earlier deposition testimony generally does not create an issue of material fact
• discussing discretion and judgment under both the administrative and professional exemptions together, noting that the “use of independent judgment necessarily implied the use of judgment generally
• “[T]raining responsibilities . . . are evidence of duties that are administrative in nature.”
• employee who qualified for the administrative exemption “managed at least fifteen clients at a given time”
• focusing on individual educational attainment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).