Nancy J. Harris, on Her Own Behalf and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for leave to file new evidence where “records were not newly discovered; they were overlooked”
• refusing to require district court to consider affidavit submitted nine months after the discovery deadline had passed
• “When, at best, the possibilities are evenly balanced, the court should enter judgment for the defendant on the ground that causation cannot be proved.”
• “mere possibility . . . is not enough”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).