Sharma v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the supreme court ordered supplemental briefing after raising issues at oral argument, and reaching issues addressed in the supplemental briefs
• explaining that the supreme court ordered supplemental briefing after raising issues at oral argument, and reaching issues addressed in the supplemental briefs
• an accomplice with the requisite mens rea is as culpable as the person who actually perpetrates the offense
• an accomplice with the requisite mens rea is as culpable as the person who actually perpetrates the offense
• “Intent to kill . . . may be ascertained or deduced from the facts and circumstances . . . such as use of a weapon calculated to produce death, the manner 2 of use, and the attendant circumstances.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).