Fulgham v. Fischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• erroneous legal conclusion does not require reversal –22– unless the controlling findings of fact and the record will not support a correct legal theory
• if more than scintilla of evidence exists to support finding, legal sufficiency challenge fails

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).