Skip to main content
· 6/27/2002

BMC Software Belgium, NV v. Marchand

Citations

  • 83 S.W.3d 789
  • 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 930
  • 2002 Tex. LEXIS 103
  • 2001 WL 1898473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court = s decision to grant or deny a motion for continuance will be reversed only upon a showing of a clear abuse of discretion
  • concluding trial court lacked specific jurisdiction because nature of the claims demonstrate that they could only arise from defendant’s conduct outside of Texas
  • noting that the activities listed in section 17.042 are not the exclusive means of doing business in Texas
  • holding no evidence supported trial court’s determination that nonresident defendant subject to personal jurisdiction and rendering judgment of dismissal
  • holding no abuse of discretion shown where party did not file motion to compel discovery
  • finding no personal jurisdiction where details of a personal services contract were discussed in Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.