Lamajak, Inc. v. Frazin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an oral agreement for undefined services was too indefinite
• holding no enforceable oral contract existed where there was no evidence what services would be rendered in exchange for share of gross profits
• stating that although witnesses provided testimony about work one party provided after contract was allegedly performed, there was no evidence that parties had actually agreed to “what services” would be provided in exchange for share of gross profits
• stating that although witnesses provided testimony about work one party provided after contract was allegedly performed, there was no evidence that parties had actually agreed to \what services\ would be provided in exchange for share of gross profits
• “The contract must be certain and clear as to all essential terms or the contract will fail for indefiniteness.”
• \The contract must be certain and clear as to all essential terms or the contract will fail for indefiniteness.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).