Skip to main content
· 7/24/2006

Pulley v. Milberger

Citations

  • 198 S.W.3d 418
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6446
  • 2006 WL 2044977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that absent rebutting evidence, “the presumption that the landlord acted in bad faith compels a finding of bad faith”
  • noting that evidence that landlord has reason to believe that entitled to retain security deposit to recover reasonable damages or evidence of “extensive damage” may be sufficient to defeat bad-faith presumption
  • evidence of no damage prior to move-in and installation of new carpet several months prior to move-in sufficient to support finding of reasonableness of charges
  • no bad faith where evidence showed amateur landlord believed he was entitled to retain portion of deposit for extensive damages caused by tenant
  • “When a landlord is sued under section 92.109(a), the landlord has the burden to prove that the retention of the security deposit was reasonable.”
  • “To defeat the presumption of bad faith, the landlord must prove his good faith, i.e., honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richter, Lang, Mazzant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.