Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that proof of a defect is required in an action for breach of implied warranty of merchantability”
• explaining that products liability “defect” requires showing of dangerousness, unlike UCC
• explaining that products liability \defect\ requires showing of dangerousness, unlike UCC
• noting that holding required change in PJC
• “Evidence of proper use of the goods together with a malfunction may be sufficient evidence of a defect.”
• “Generally, when one party appeals from a judgment, a reversal as to that party will not justify a reversal as to other nonappealing parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).