Catalina v. Blasdel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court’s findings and conclusions are reviewable for evidentiary sufficiency
• providing trial court’s findings of fact reviewed for sufficiency under same standards used to review jury findings
• the definition of 297 (Tex.1994); Tucker v. Tucker, 908 S.W.2d 530, 532 “plat” includes a replat
• trial judge’s findings are reviewed for sufficiency of the evidence just like jury findings
• standard of review for no-evidence issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).