Frantz v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ erred where he ignored evidence “that would support a finding of disability”
• remanding where the ALJ did not specify the mental demands of the claimant’s past work or evaluate whether the claimant could meet those demands despite her bipolar disorder
• “[T]he ALJ erred in accepting some of the moderate limitations in the Mental RFC form . . . but rejecting others without discussion.”
• “[T]he ALJ erred in accepting some of the moderate limitations in the Mental RFC form . . . but rejecting others without discussion.”
• ALJ may not ignore evidence from “other source” that supports a finding of disability “while highlighting evidence favorable to the finding of nondisability.”
• ALJ erred by “ignor[ing] evidence from [a clinical nurse specialist] that would support a finding of disability while highlighting evidence favorable to the finding of nondisability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).