Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ “must discuss the uncontroverted evidence he chooses not to rely upon, as well as significantly probative evidence he rejects”
• holding that substantial evidence requires consideration of both evidence supportive of the ALJ’s determination but also significantly probative evidence the ALJ rejected
• concluding that ALJ must discuss evidence supporting his decision as well as evidence “he chooses not to rely upon” and “significantly probative evidence” he rejects
• holding that substantial evidence requires consideration of both evidence supportive of the ALJ’s determination but also significantly probative evidence the ALJ rejected
• holding that remand was appropriate where RFC did not include all limitations and ALJ did not articulate the reason for exclusion of certain limitations
• holding that a bare conclusion that a claimant did not meet the requirements of the Listings “is beyond meaningful judicial review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).