Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the absence of clearly articulated reasoning discussing claimant’s credibility, the record did not support a finding that claimant was not credible
• holding that we review “with heightened scrutiny” the Commissioner’s reasons for rejecting an ALJ’s credibility findings
• holding that we review “with heightened scrutiny” the Commissioner’s reasons for rejecting an ALJ’s credibility findings
• holding that the ALJ's determination of credibility is afforded deference on review
• indicating that “[i]f the claimant presents medical evidence and makes the showing of medical severity, the decision maker proceeds to step three
• explaining that the burden at step five is on Commissioner to show that claimant retains the RFC to perform specific jobs that exist in the national economy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).