Doyal v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ did not improperly delegate his duties to the VE where “he quoted the VE’s testimony approvingly, in support of his own findings”
• deciding that doctor who had seen claimant only once was not treating doctor and his opinion was not entitled to controlling weight
• holding that ALJ did not improperly delegate his step four duties to the VE where “he quoted the VE’s testimony approvingly, in support of his own findings at phases two and three of the analysis”
• holding that ALJ did not improperly delegate his step four duties to the VE where “he quoted the VE’s testimony approvingly, in support of his own findings at phases two and three of the analysis”
• holding that ALJ did not improperly delegate his step four duties to the VE where “he quoted the VE’s testimony approvingly, in support of his own findings at phases two and three of the analysis”
• holding that ALJ did not improperly delegate his step four duties to the vocational expert (VE) where “he quoted the VE’s testimony approvingly, in support of his own findings at phases two and three of the analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).