Skip to main content
· 2/4/2011

Madron v. Astrue

Citations

  • 646 F.3d 1255
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2351
  • 2011 WL 905433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in abuse of discretion review, “it is the appellant’s obligation to shoulder the burden of showing an error of this magnitude has occurred”
  • “it does not necessarily follow from our decision vacating an administrative decision that the government’s efforts to defend that decision lacked substantial justification”
  • “it does not necessarily follow from our decision vacating an administrative decision that the government’s efforts to defend that decision lacked substantial justification”
  • “it does not necessarily follow from our decision vacating an administrative decision that the government’s efforts to defend that decision lacked substantial justification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Porfilio, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.