Tenth Circuit· 2/4/2004

Allen v. Barnhart

Citations

357 F.3d 1140
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712
2004 WL 206331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that district court's \post hoc effort to salvage the ALJ's decision would require us to overstep our institutional role and usurp essential functions committed in the first instance to the administrative process\
recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Briscoe, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Allen v. Barnhart

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.