Skip to main content
· 2/4/2004

Allen v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 357 F.3d 1140
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712
  • 2004 WL 206331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court's \post hoc effort to salvage the ALJ's decision would require us to overstep our institutional role and usurp essential functions committed in the first instance to the administrative process\
  • recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
  • recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
  • recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
  • recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases
  • recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has “specifically applied [the principle of harmless error] in social security disability cases” and citing cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Briscoe, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.