People v. Tully

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claimant entitled to presumption that aggravation of his pre-existing psoriasis was due to the rough and stressful driving conditions he experienced over a two-month period in his job as a bus driver
• holding claimant entitled to presumption that aggravation of his pre-existing psoriasis was due' to thé rough and stressful driving conditions he experienced over a two-month period in his job as a bus driver
• interpreting similar provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901, et seq. (Longshoremen’s Act)
• applying the “aggravation rule” to find aggravation of a claimant’s preexisting psoriasis compensable under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
• it is “indisputable” that an aggravation of a pre-existing condition may constitute a compensable injury
• the presumption is “but one indication of the ‘humanitarian nature’ of the Act generally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).