Skip to main content
· 10/4/1999

United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott Hill

Citations

  • 195 F.3d 258
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24597
  • 1999 WL 781810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a driver’s license check was within the original scope of a traffic stop based upon a traffic violation
  • ruling that a traffic stop that included an officer’s heeded request that a driver sit in the officer’s patrol car was not unreasonably prolonged
  • noting that an officer's credibility in making the initial traffic stop must be scrutinized, particularly when a target vehicle such as a U-Haul is involved
  • noting that an officer’s credibility in making the initial traffic stop must be scrutinized, particularly when a target vehicle such as a U-Haul is involved
  • holding that the totality of the circumstances, including one of the defendant’s uncontrollably shaky hands and apparent nervousness, as well as the defendants’ unusual explanation of their cross-country trip, “plainly supported a reasonable suspicion of illegal activity”
  • finding that the officer had a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, which allowed him to detain a motorist in order for a drug-detection dog to conduct a sniff search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Boggs, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.