Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 139 S.W.3d 61
  • 2004 WL 1301266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the court of criminal appeals has not overruled Sodipo in the specific context of 28.10 but following Cain determining that a harm analysis is required
  • noting prior offenses that must be alleged for offense of felony theft are jurisdictional elements of the offense itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.