Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/31/2001
Santana v. State
Citations
- 59 S.W.3d 187
- 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
- 2001 WL 1338387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant did not face double jeopardy because, “if prosecuted again, [he] may avail himself of the entire record and not merely the charging instrument”
- recognizing that the surplusage rule and the Burrell exception were overruled in Gollihar
- recognizing that the surplusage rule and the Burrell exception were overruled in Gollihar
- noting that, in variance law, it is the defendant’s burden to demonstrate prejudice to a substantial right
- stating that, if prosecuted again, the defendant may avail himself of the entire record and not merely the charging instrument to avoid subsequent prosecution for the same offense
- stating, \We explicitly overruled the surplusage rule and the Burrell exception in Gollihar .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-11-26· cited 137×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-06-15· cited 67×
- Ex Parte Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-09· cited 49×
- Hart v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-24· cited 47×
- Roy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-03-07· cited 44×
- Romeo Hinojosa v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-05-07· cited 41×
- Stafford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2008-02-20· cited 37×
- Rogers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-22· cited 34×
- Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-10-06· cited 28×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-02-03· cited 17×
- Charlton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-03-19· cited 14×
- Serna v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-03-20· cited 14×
- Alston v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-11-08· cited 5×
- Bolyard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-07-13· cited 2×
- Wade Eugene Dix v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-07-07
- Roderick Glenn v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-06-18
- Cornelius Russell Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-04-29
- in the Matter of I. R. H.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-08-08
- Walter Painter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-07-26
- Harry Rutledge, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-15
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-16· cited 1,349×
- Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-04-16· cited 1,005×
- Human v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-03-16· cited 206×
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-11· cited 148×
- Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-28· cited 130×
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-01-25· cited 117×
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-01-28· cited 101×
- Howlett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-09· cited 91×
- Plessinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-12· cited 71×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.