Trejos v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering appellant’s failure to “assist in searching for [complainant] after she disappeared” in concluding that State’s evidence satisfied corpus de-licti of murder
• determining whether the trial court’s erroneous ruling under article 28.10 was harmless error under Rule 44.2(b)
• finding no custody when suspect “rode with a police officer to the station” and “was only interviewed by one police officer, who was in plain clothes, and in an office-like setting.”
• stating, “To determine whether the testimony describing the alerts by the cadaver dogs meets the third prong in Nenno, we must examine the (1) the qualifications of the particular trainer, (2) the qualifications of the particular dog, and (3
• stating, “To determine whether the testimony describing the alerts by the cadaver dogs meets the third prong in Nenno, we must examine the (1) the qualifications of the particular trainer, (2) the qualifications of the particular dog, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).