Skip to main content
· 12/14/2011

State v. Robert Louis Rosseau

Citations

  • 398 S.W.3d 769
  • 2011 WL 6207037
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellee “failed to rebut the presumption of constitutionality by proving that the statute operates unconstitutionally in all its applications”
  • noting that a pretrial motion to quash an indictment may be used only for a facial rather than an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a statute
  • determining that appellant presented only an as-applied challenge to statute because neither the text of the motion to quash nor his argument in the trial court raised a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the challenged statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Speedlin, Barnard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.