· 12/14/2011
State v. Robert Louis Rosseau
Citations
- 398 S.W.3d 769
- 2011 WL 6207037
- 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellee “failed to rebut the presumption of constitutionality by proving that the statute operates unconstitutionally in all its applications”
- noting that a pretrial motion to quash an indictment may be used only for a facial rather than an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a statute
- determining that appellant presented only an as-applied challenge to statute because neither the text of the motion to quash nor his argument in the trial court raised a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the challenged statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Speedlin, Barnard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.