Skip to main content

Fike v. State

Citations

  • 4 So. 3d 734
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3518
  • 2009 WL 485061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate fundamental error
  • noting that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate fundamental error
  • noting that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate fundamental error
  • finding fundamental error, observing “as this case turned solely on M.S.F.’s credibility. There was no physical evidence to corroborate her version of events, nor was there any confession or admission. This was a swearing match between Fike and M.S.F.”
  • “[T]he issue was not preserved for appellate review because the specific objection complained of on appeal was not raised below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger, Palmer, Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.