Skip to main content

Wheeler v. State

Citations

  • 87 So. 3d 5
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 674
  • 2012 WL 162029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that appellate court was not required to undertake fundamental error analysis where defendant did not raise claim of fundamental error in initial appellate brief
  • “[T]he defendant did not raise a claim of fundamental error relating to this issue in his initial brief; therefore, this court is not required to undertake a fundamental error analysis.”
  • “[T]he defendant did not raise a claim of fundamental error relating to this issue in his initial brief; therefore, this court is not required to undertake a fundamental error analysis.”
  • “Furthermore, the defendant did not raise a claim of fundamental error . . . in his initial brief; therefore, this court is not required to undertake a fundamental error analysis.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Evander, Griffin, Jacobus, Lawson, Monaco, Orfinger, Palmer, Sawaya, Torpy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.