Skip to main content

Sanchez v. State

Citations

  • 909 So. 2d 981
  • 2005 WL 2175450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the failure to show proof that a defendant specifically intended to damage or destroy the property in question is fatal to a conviction for criminal mischief
  • finding that the State failed to prove the crime of criminal mischief where the defendant, with ill will and malice toward a store clerk attempted to rob him and in the process the clerk’s telephone was damaged
  • acting with malice toward the person of the owner of the property is not enough to support a conviction for criminal mischief
  • reversing conviction for criminal mischief as fundamental error when evidence failed to show defendant’s specific intent to damage property
  • acting with malice toward the person of the owner of the property is not enough to support a conviction for criminal mischief
  • finding that where defendant, with ill will and malice toward a store clerk attempted to rob him, and in the process damaged the clerk's telephone, there was insufficient evidence that the ill will or malice was in any way redirected from the clerk to the telephone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.