Skip to main content
· 9/5/1989

Davis v. Hamm

Citations

  • 387 S.E.2d 676
  • 300 S.C. 284
  • 1989 S.C. App. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a trial court’s determination that the Act “statutorily abrogated” earlier “well-established principles” of shareholder derivative suits articulated in precedent predating passage of the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardner, Cureton, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.