Johnson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If possible, all issues between the parties should be resolved ... so that disputes and irritants do not linger and present further incentives to litigation.”
• the family court should attempt to sever all entangling legal relationships and to place the parties in a position to begin anew

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooten v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
• Nasser-Moghaddassi v. Moghaddassi
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 37×
• Morris v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-10· cited 27×
• Fields v. Fields
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-21· cited 20×
• Craig v. Craig
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 16×
• Belton v. Belton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 10×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 27×
• Whitfield v. Hanks
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-29· cited 21×
• Shafer v. Shafer
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-18· cited 19×
• Thompson v. Brunson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-24· cited 18×
• Jones v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-05· cited 16×
• Tucker v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-22· cited 13×