Skip to main content

Ferguson v. State

Citations

  • 483 A.2d 1255
  • 301 Md. 542
  • 1984 Md. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963)
  • “[A]n intervening circumstance is an event that breaks the causal connection between the unlawful conduct and the derivative evidence.”
  • “[T]he exclusionary rule ... [is] a judicially imposed sanction for violations of the [FJourth [AJmendment against unreasonable searches and seizures in state prosecutions”
  • “[TJhe Comi extended the exclusionary rule to evidence that was the indirect product or ‘fruit’ of police misconduct in violation of the fourth amend- -merit.” (Emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.