Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/20/2011

Cox v. State

Citations

28 A.3d 687
421 Md. 630
2011 Md. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “we analyze the admission of out-of-court statements against criminal defendants under the framework created by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington ”
noting that “we analyze the admission of out-of- 42 The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, incorporated to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, (Pointer v. State of Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403, 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1066, 13 L.Ed.2d 923, 924 (1965)
“[T]he fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine excludes direct and indirect evidence that is a product of police conduct in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
“[T]he fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine excludes direct and indirect evidence that is a product of police conduct in violation of the Fourth Amendment.” (Cita tions and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.