Commonwealth v. Crowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether inference is warranted or impermissibly remote is determined not by hard and fast rules of law, but by experience and common sense
• court concluded that motion judge, who had adopted victim’s facts in findings without specifically determining credibility, had credited her testimony in those respects
• photographic identifications suppressed on the ground that they were a product of an illegal detention resulting from an illegal arrest of the defendants
• “[I]t is necessary that the portion of the statement that the [proponent] seeks to introduce qualify or explain the segment introduced by the [the other party]”
• nolle prosequi of complaint does not ordinarily bar indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).