Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/20/1993
Fairbanks v. State
Citations
- 629 A.2d 63
- 331 Md. 482
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Post-conviction and habeas corpus remedies are available only if the defendant is in custody or subject to conditions of parole or probation.”
- “[T]he Supreme Court decided in Gideon that indigent defendants in state felony prosecutions are entitled to appointment of counsel.”
- “Because a facially valid conviction is entitled to a strong presumption of regularity, [a post-conviction relief] procedure clearly places the burden of proof where it should be — upon the defendant attacking the conviction.”
- State carries burden of proving counseled plea by adducing “a docket entry or other affirmative statement that the defendant waived the right to counsel. If the record does not so show, the State bears the burden of showing waiver”
- “A defendant who is prevented [by our ruling] from challenging the constitutionality of a prior conviction ... during a sentencing proceeding ... may thereafter mount a collateral challenge by any means that remain available, including post-conviction procedures ....”
- “Because a facially valid conviction is entitled to a strong presumption of regularity, [established procedures for collaterally attacking a conviction, including the UPPA,] clearly placet ] the burden of proof where it should be — upon the defendant attacking the conviction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAULIFFE
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-07-06· cited 122×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-21· cited 53×
- State v. MaineMontana Supreme Court· 2011-05-02· cited 48×
- State v. VeikosoHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-08-11· cited 44×
- Beverly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-17· cited 41×
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-28· cited 37×
- Ruby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-22· cited 34×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-02· cited 21×
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-08-02· cited 21×
- Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-26· cited 19×
- State v. KidoHawaii Supreme Court· 2006-02-14· cited 17×
- Moguel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-06· cited 10×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-26· cited 10×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-21· cited 10×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-27· cited 7×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-20· cited 6×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-03-30· cited 5×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-10· cited 4×
- Kranz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-06-21
- State v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-20
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court· 1993-01-19· cited 1,268×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
- Loper v. BetoSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 474×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 153×
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-16· cited 134×
- Lewis v. DiethornSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 134×
- Kitchens v. SmithSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 127×
- Poteat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 92×
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-07· cited 88×
- United States v. Alonzo DayEighth Circuit· 1991-11-21· cited 82×
- Curtis C. Oliver v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1992-04-23· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.