Skip to main content

Beverly v. State

Citations

  • 707 A.2d 91
  • 349 Md. 106
  • 1998 Md. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t is well-settled that the determination of which criminal charges, if any, to bring is a matter of prosecutorial discretion”
  • holding defendant whose plea of guilty was improperly denied by trial court did not waive issue on appeal after conviction because he was faced with coercive choice
  • finding reversible error, resulting in a remand for a new sentencing, where sentencing judge failed to recognize “that she had discretion to sentence in accord with the plea agreement”
  • finding reversible error, resulting in a remand for a new sentencing where the sentencing judge abused her discretion in failing to recognize that she had discretion to sentence in accord with the plea agreement
  • finding reversible error, resulting in a remand for a new sentencing where the sentencing judge abused her discretion in failing to recognize that she had discretion to sentence in accord with the plea agreement
  • finding reversible error, resulting in a remand for a new sentencing, where sentencing judge failed to recognize “that she had discretion to sentence in accord with the plea agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.