State v. Veikoso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence involving another complaining witness would not be admissible to prove identity because identity was not disputed
• “Regarding the erroneous admission of evidence by a trial court, this court has said that[, e]ven if the trial court erred in admitting evidence, a defendant’s conviction will not be overturned if the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).