Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A hearing judge’s factual finding is not clearly erroneous [i]f there is any competent material evidence to support [it].” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “A hearing judge’s factual finding is not clearly erroneous ‘[i]f there is any competent material evidence to support [it]’”
• a prosecutor is “held to even higher standards of conduct than other attorneys due to [the] unique role as both advocate and minister of justice”
• “A hearing judge’s factual finding is not clearly erroneous ‘[i]f there is any competent material evidence to support [it]’”
• courts “routinely apply their common sense, powers of logic, and accumulated experiences in life” to draw reasonable inferences “from demonstrated sets of facts” (cleaned up)
• “Prosecutors must be held to even higher standards of conduct than other attorneys due to their unique role as both advocate and minister of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).