Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 90 S.W.3d 308
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 213
  • 2002 WL 31468241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when a juror becomes disabled, “‘the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict’ [and that t]here is no need to obtain anyone’s consent in this instance”
  • State requested abatement to develop record of what happened during in-chambers conference in order to prove manifest necessity for a mistrial and attached an affidavit to its motion to abate
  • Because the statute states that “the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict,” Article 36.29(a) does not require that the trial court obtain any party’s consent to proceed when one juror becomes disabled.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Keller, Cochran, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

132 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.