Supreme Court of Virginia· 3/1/2002
Commonwealth v. Washington
Citations
- 559 S.E.2d 636
- 263 Va. 298
- 2002 Va. LEXIS 47
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he various United States Courts of Appeals have held that a defendant’s consent to a mistrial is implied when a defendant had an opportunity to object to a mistrial but failed to do so” and applying this* rule
- statement of the operative facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leroy R. Hassell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2005-04-22· cited 154×
- Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2004-01-16· cited 128×
- Townsend v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2005-09-16· cited 76×
- Green v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-06-06· cited 57×
- Nathan Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-10-18· cited 53×
- Robert Daniel King, a/k/a, etc v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-04-29· cited 10×
- Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-06-08· cited 8×
- Knox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-03-22· cited 8×
- Gibson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-08-28· cited 7×
- State v. Leon-SimajNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-22
- Powell v. Knoepfler-PowellSupreme Court of Virginia· 2024-06-27
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 1,511×
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,194×
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-22· cited 985×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 631×
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 610×
- United States v. BascaroEleventh Circuit· 1984-10-01· cited 237×
- Fisher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1988-11-18· cited 168×
- United States v. Ivan Buljubasic and Slobodan PavlovicSeventh Circuit· 1987-02-02· cited 150×
- United States v. Albert GoldsteinSecond Circuit· 1973-05-25· cited 148×
- Ex Parte LittleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-02· cited 122×
- Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1980-01-07· cited 122×
- Schmitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-08· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.