Skip to main content
· 4/5/1993

Esslinger v. Baltimore City

Citations

  • 622 A.2d 774
  • 95 Md. App. 607
  • 1993 Md. App. LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching a similar conclusion regarding the scope of administrative appeals pursuant to Subtitle B of the Maryland Rules
  • rejecting application of res judicata even though “[u]nder the ‘transaction’ approach, it is clear that the [earlier] claim . . . is identical to the present claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Fischer, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.