Skip to main content
· 5/30/1996

Erb v. Maryland Department of Environment

Citations

  • 676 A.2d 1017
  • 110 Md. App. 246
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even if the plaintiff had a jury right in an administrative proceeding, it was waived because he made no demand for a jury trial when appealing in the Circuit Court
  • “[O]ur review of the record has failed to disclose that appellant made any demand for a jury trial . . . . Thus, even if appellant had [] a right to a jury trial, it was waived.”
  • “Generally, the scope of a court’s review of agency action ... is confined to the record made before the administrative agency. The presentation of new evidence to the circuit court is inconsistent with the narrow scope of judicial review of agency decisions.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell, Davis, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.