Major v. First Virginia Bank-Central Maryland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a fee award taxed to attorneys after “three courts and at least as many judges” found the claim involved to be without merit
• “appellants ... are not playing so ‘fast and loose’ as to require the application of judicial estoppel.”
• “This Court has emphasized that Rule 1-341 is not a sanctions rule in the same sense as Rule 11. It does not provide for a monetary award to punish a party that misbehaves. The rule’s purpose is to put the wronged party in the same position as if the offending conduct had not occurred.”
• “This Court has emphasized that Rule 1-341 is not a sanctions rule in the same sense as Rule 11. It does not provide for a monetary award to punish a party that misbehaves. The rule’s purpose is to put the wronged party in the same position as if the offending conduct had not occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).