Skip to main content
· 4/29/1994

Warner v. German

Citations

  • 642 A.2d 239
  • 100 Md. App. 512
  • 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that parties lacked privity where the plaintiff in the second action did not have “the same incentives” in litigation
  • “[WJhen analyzing the lower court’s decision, we ordinarily are confined to the basis relied on by that court and may not otherwise explain its conclusion by introducing new legal theories.”
  • “when analyzing the lower court’s decision, we ordinarily are confined to the basis relied on by that court and may not otherwise explain its conclusion by introducing new legal theories”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bloom, Fischer, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.