· 4/29/1994
Warner v. German
Citations
- 642 A.2d 239
- 100 Md. App. 512
- 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that parties lacked privity where the plaintiff in the second action did not have “the same incentives” in litigation
- “[WJhen analyzing the lower court’s decision, we ordinarily are confined to the basis relied on by that court and may not otherwise explain its conclusion by introducing new legal theories.”
- “when analyzing the lower court’s decision, we ordinarily are confined to the basis relied on by that court and may not otherwise explain its conclusion by introducing new legal theories”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bloom, Fischer, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.