Kent County Board of Education v. Bilbrough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Equating claim with transaction, however, is justified only when the parties have ample procedural means for fully developing the entire transaction in the one action . . . .”
• \... scope of a cause of action for claim preclusion purposes is not as broad as the scope of permissible joinder under modern pleading codes.\
• “To make the scope of “claim” co-extensive with permissive joinder of claims in pleadings would have the same effect as a mandatory joinder for pleading purposes of all claims which the original plaintiff has against any original defendant.”
• “To make the scope of “claim” co-extensive with permissive joinder of claims in pleadings would have the same effect as a mandatory joinder for pleading purposes of all claims which the original plaintiff has against any original defendant.”
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 24

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).