Skip to main content
· 9/9/1985

Leese v. Baltimore County

Citations

  • 497 A.2d 159
  • 64 Md. App. 442
  • 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of previous interpersonal conflict between a Baltimore County employee and his supervisors was sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss
  • noting that statements are defamatory per se when “if true, [they] would disqualify him or render him less fit properly to fulfill the duties incident to the special character assumed.”
  • \We can conceive of no clearer `mandate of public policy' than the rights spelled out in the United States constitution\
  • “We can conceive of no clearer ‘mandate of public policy’ than the rights spelled out in the United States constitution”
  • “While the existence of a privilege is an issue of law, its forfeiture by abuse is an issue of fact.”
  • “We can conceive of no clearer ‘mandate of public policy’ than the rights spelled out in the United States Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.