Montana Supreme Court· 2/26/1979
Fiscus v. Beartooth Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Citations
- 591 P.2d 196
- 180 Mont. 434
- 1979 Mont. LEXIS 746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that when we state in an opinion “a principle or rule of law necessary to the decision, such pronouncement becomes the law of the case, and must be adhered to throughout its subsequent progress”
- concluding that when we state in an opinion “a principle or rule of law necessary to the decision, such pronouncement becomes the law of the case, and must be adhered to throughout its subsequent progress”
- noting that “the doctrine is inapplicable” where the prior decision was manifestly “unsound, . . . incorrect,” or based on a manifest “mistake of fact . . . made on [the] first appeal”
- Judgment reduced on its merit is an absolute bar to a subsequent action between same parties
- Judgment reduced on its merits is an absolute bar to a subsequent action between the same parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daly, Harrison, Haswell, McPHILLIPS, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-12-20· cited 79×
- Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court· 2001-10-31· cited 74×
- State v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 57×
- Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1981-04-19· cited 41×
- Taylor v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 38×
- Scott v. ScottMontana Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 34×
- Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court· 2007-06-12· cited 34×
- Zavarelli v. MightMontana Supreme Court· 1989-09-14· cited 31×
- In Re the Marriage of WatersMontana Supreme Court· 1986-09-10· cited 29×
- Koch Ex Rel. Koch v. Billings School District No. 2Montana Supreme Court· 1992-06-11· cited 28×
- In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 26×
- State v. SouthwickMontana Supreme Court· 2007-10-09· cited 26×
- Moody v. Northland Royalty Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1997-12-12· cited 21×
- State v. Barry Allan BeachMontana Supreme Court· 2013-05-14· cited 20×
- Blaine and Hill Co. v. StrickerMontana Supreme Court· 2017-04-11· cited 19×
- Plains Grains Ltd. Partnership v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court· 2010-07-16· cited 16×
- State v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 15×
- State v. LindemanMontana Supreme Court· 1997-11-04· cited 12×
- Grenfell v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court· 2002-10-10· cited 11×
- In Re the Estate of SnyderMontana Supreme Court· 2007-06-12· cited 11×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-12-11· cited 1,471×
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 1,144×
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 385×
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27First Circuit· 1972-01-03· cited 253×
- United States v. ZuccaSupreme Court· 1956-04-30· cited 94×
- Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1959-01-06· cited 89×
- State v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court· 1977-12-29· cited 34×
- Griffin v. State Board of EducationE.D. Virginia· 1969-02-11· cited 30×
- Cluff v. DayNew York Court of Appeals· 1894-02-06· cited 22×
- Fiscus v. Beartooth ElectricMontana Supreme Court· 1974-05-07· cited 12×
- Perkins v. KramerMontana Supreme Court· 1948-06-16· cited 12×
- Piper v. Lockwood Water Users Ass'nMontana Supreme Court· 1978-01-06· cited 10×
- Western Montana Production Credit Ass'n v. Hydroponics, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1966-02-04· cited 9×
- Tsakonites v. Transpacific Carriers Corp.S.D. New York· 1970-07-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.