Veterans Claims· 2/23/1990

Erspamer v. Derwinski

Citations

1 Vet. App. 3
1990 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1
1990 WL 303127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court has the authority to issue mandamus to the Secretary under the All Writs Act
concluding that the petitioner had no adequate alternative means for relief when she contacted the regional office more than 30 times before filing her petition with the Court
holding “that this court has jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act”
holding \that this court has jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act\
noting that a requirement for a writ to issue is that the petitioner must lack adequate alternative means to obtain the relief sought
noting that “petition for relief in and of itself’ may be “enough to bring [a disputed] matter to the attention of the Secretary, and effectively serve[ ] ... to exhaust that administrative remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Kramer, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.