Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that challenges to the BPA's rate-making process not subject to FERC review may still be raised on judicial review of final FERC rate decision, but cannot be raised in an interlocutory petition for review
• holding “that where a statute commits review of final agency action to the court of appeals, any suit seeking relief that might affect the court’s future jurisdiction is subject to its exclusive review”
• following Telecommc’n Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984) in the context of 16 U.S.C. § 839f(e)(5
• refusing to review interlocutory appeal of agency action on grounds of exhaustion and ripeness
• strong preference for reviewing all preliminary or ancillary issues in forum provided for final agency action
• agency bias in rate-setting procedures correctable on review of final rate order through vacating rates and ordering refunds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).