Skip to main content
· 3/31/1983

Potomac Electric Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor

Citations

  • 702 F.2d 1026
  • 226 U.S. App. D.C. 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning that \excessive delay saps the public confidence in an agency's ability to discharge its responsibilities\
  • \[O]ur remand in the earlier appeal to this court implicitly included the understanding that the Commission would respond to our mandate in a timely manner.\
  • authority under All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (1982), to issue writ of mandamus to preserve future jurisdiction
  • “The power grounded in 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) to compel agency action can also be effectuated through the use of a writ of mandamus.”
  • “[O]nce the [agency] has rendered a final decision, the issue . . . will be moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson, Tamm, Lum-Bard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.