· 3/31/1983
Potomac Electric Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor
Citations
- 702 F.2d 1026
- 226 U.S. App. D.C. 289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warning that \excessive delay saps the public confidence in an agency's ability to discharge its responsibilities\
- \[O]ur remand in the earlier appeal to this court implicitly included the understanding that the Commission would respond to our mandate in a timely manner.\
- authority under All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (1982), to issue writ of mandamus to preserve future jurisdiction
- “The power grounded in 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) to compel agency action can also be effectuated through the use of a writ of mandamus.”
- “[O]nce the [agency] has rendered a final decision, the issue . . . will be moot.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson, Tamm, Lum-Bard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.